Skip to main content
archive
Search Submit Donate Log in
Press Enter to search · Advanced search

Computer Science > Human-Computer Interaction

arXiv:2603.29888 (cs)
[Submitted on 8 Feb 2026 (v1), last revised 31 Jul 2026 (this version, v2)]

Title:Generative AI in Action: Field Experimental Evidence from Alibaba's Customer Service Operations

Authors:Xiao Ni, Yiwei Wang, Tianjun Feng, Lauren Xiaoyan Lu, Yitong Wang, Congyi Zhou
View a PDF of the paper titled Generative AI in Action: Field Experimental Evidence from Alibaba's Customer Service Operations, by Xiao Ni and 5 other authors
View PDF
Abstract:In collaboration with Alibaba, we study how a generative AI assistant affects service performance in e-commerce after-sales operations. In a large-scale field experiment, human agents providing digital chat support were randomly assigned access to a gen AI assistant. The assistant drafts issue diagnoses and solution proposals in the opening stage only; agents can adopt, modify, or disregard them. Because of this discretion, we estimate the effects of both gen AI access and usage. On average, gen AI improves service speed and subjective service quality, measured by customer ratings, but has no significant effect on objective service quality, measured by customer retrials. These gains come from more than automation. Gen AI reshapes agent-customer interactions: treated agents respond faster and take a more proactive role, while customers provide less input; both patterns persist into later chat stages. These average effects, however, mask heterogeneity across agents. Lower-performing agents benefit the most, indicating that gen AI can narrow performance gaps. Top-performing agents experience declines in both subjective and objective service quality. This decline is consistent with workflow disruption: among top performers, gen AI use increases shift-away time, response delays, and immediate customer retrials, suggesting weakened service continuity in the focal chat. Successful gen AI deployment therefore requires careful performance evaluation and rollout tailored to agent skill.
Subjects: Human-Computer Interaction (cs.HC); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)
Cite as: arXiv:2603.29888 [cs.HC]
  (or arXiv:2603.29888v2 [cs.HC] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2603.29888
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

Submission history

From: Xiao Ni [view email]
[v1] Sun, 8 Feb 2026 19:41:01 UTC (4,585 KB)
[v2] Fri, 31 Jul 2026 16:48:14 UTC (1,466 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

    View a PDF of the paper titled Generative AI in Action: Field Experimental Evidence from Alibaba's Customer Service Operations, by Xiao Ni and 5 other authors
  • View PDF
view license

Current browse context:

cs.HC
< prev   |   next >
new | recent | 2026-03
Change to browse by:
cs
cs.AI

References & Citations

  • NASA ADS
  • Google Scholar
  • Semantic Scholar
Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

Data provided by:

Bookmark

BibSonomy Reddit

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Recommenders and Search Tools

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
  • Author
  • Venue
  • Institution
  • Topic

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)
We gratefully acknowledge support from our major funders, member institutions, , and all contributors.
About · Help · Contact · Subscribe · Copyright · Privacy · Accessibility · Operational Status (opens in new tab)
Major funding support from
Simons Foundation Simons Foundation International Schmidt Sciences