{"url":"https:\/\/x.com\/lugaricano\/status\/2038683186230694081","author_name":"Luis Garicano \uD83C\uDDEA\uD83C\uDDFA\uD83C\uDDFA\uD83C\uDDE6","author_url":"https:\/\/x.com\/lugaricano","html":"\u003Cblockquote class=\"twitter-tweet\"\u003E\u003Cp lang=\"en\" dir=\"ltr\"\u003EI disagree with this evaluation. I will focus on the original\/extended Katz and Murphy paper and an extension. Francis (2026) is wrong when he treats the original Katz and Murphy as a failed forecasting equation. If  there is one paper to which Leamer's critique does not apply,… \u003Ca href=\"https:\/\/t.co\/DUF4id1Wz4\"\u003Epic.twitter.com\/DUF4id1Wz4\u003C\/a\u003E\u003C\/p\u003E— Luis Garicano \uD83C\uDDEA\uD83C\uDDFA\uD83C\uDDFA\uD83C\uDDE6 (@lugaricano) \u003Ca href=\"https:\/\/x.com\/lugaricano\/status\/2038683186230694081?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw\"\u003EMarch 30, 2026\u003C\/a\u003E\u003C\/blockquote\u003E\n\u003Cscript async src=\"https:\/\/platform.x.com\/widgets.js\" charset=\"utf-8\"\u003E\u003C\/script\u003E\n\n","width":550,"height":null,"type":"rich","cache_age":"3153600000","provider_name":"X","provider_url":"https:\/\/x.com","version":"1.0"}